Businesses Face Consequences of Cancel Culture: The E&C Pulse

February 17, 2021
Ben DiPietro

Whether you call it "cancel culture" because you think it's overly politically correct and stifling to free speech, or whether you call it "consequence culture" because you believe leaders and organizations must be held accountable, businesses are dealing with the risks of being called out for their behavior on social media.

People feel empowered by social media to engage with companies about everything from how they make their products, to the stances they take on societal issues, to whether their rhetoric matches their actions. And so much more.

Those messages can be seen by millions of people, and have forced companies to act to issues being raised, everything from demanding a reversal of a policy, the firing of an executive, or a call to boycott their products and services.

A recent survey by Porter Novelli found large majorities of people feel empowered to voice their opinions on companies and how they behave, and that they feel can have influence on changing the way an organization acts.

And these folks are willing to act, as 36% of U.S. consumers said they have canceled a company in the past 12 months. Even companies with sterling reputations have reason to take pause from this survey, as 66% said they would stop buying products or services from a company they love if it does or says something they feel is wrong or unethical.

What is likely to get a company canceled? Seven in 10 said issues related to racial justice, 69% said women’s rights issues, 68% said COVID protocols. Further down the list: immigration (61%), climate change (57%), and politics (54%).

On the bright side, companies that get canceled can gain redemption. Nearly nine in 10 people said they would be willing to forgive an organization if it makes a genuine attempt to change, while more than eight in 10 said they would be more likely to forgive a company for its first offense. 

Nearly 40% said they hope that by canceling a company they will get it to “change its ways,” while 27% said their goal was to change a company’s political stances. Fourteen percent cited “making the company go away completely” as their main reason.

About three in four said they would be less willing to cancel a company if it is purpose-driven, which is further validation of everything we talk about and promote here at LRN, and why being driven by the right values in pursuit of a worthy mission is vital to a company's long-term survival.

                                                                                                        BEN DIPIETRO
                                                                                                       @BENDIPIETRO1
                                                                                       BEN.DIPIETRO@LRN.COM


THE ELEVEN

Climate risk is investment risk--how are boards preparing?

Are mid-sized companies ready for life after the pandemic? CEOs are looking for a bigger role in getting people vaccinated for COVID-19.

A study found diversity in law enforcement improves policing. Areas that had Black Lives Matter protests saw less lethal force used for five years after.

There's a potential downside to collaboration for the compliance department. 

The head of Tokyo's Olympic committee resigned after making sexist comments. There's been an increase in the fixing of soccer matches during the pandemic.

New U.S. regulations may be coming for so-called "forever chemicals."

States tired of waiting for the federal government to regulate big tech are doing it themselves. An ethical hacker breached the systems of at least 35 companies.

Who should be responsible for stopping unethical AI?

More companies want information from law firms about their diversity, but there is  no set standard to collect and access such data.

More companies are putting an end to the 9-to-5 day at the office. How good employees enable bad leaders.

How to integrate human rights and ESG into international regulatory compliance. The EU is considering a mandatory human rights due diligence law.

About the Author

Ben DiPietro

Joined LRN in October 2018 after 30 years as a journalist, including seven years at The Wall Street Journal, including Risk & Compliance Journal and was a creator of the WSJ Crisis of the Week column. In 2015 was named one of the 100 most influential people in business ethics by Ethisphere Institute. Spent 14 years as a reporter in Hawaii, 11 with The Associated Press.

More Content by Ben DiPietro

Most Recent Posts

LRN Joins THE INITIATIVE: Advancing the Blue and Black Partnership

LRN Joins THE INITIATIVE: Advancing the Blue and Black Partnership

LRN joined THE INITIATIVE: Advancing the Black & Blue Partnership creating new learning modules for law enforcement.

Learn More
LRN AND THE BLUE AND BLACK INITIATIVE:  A PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE

LRN AND THE BLUE AND BLACK INITIATIVE:  A PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE

LRN built a new course with our partners in Anti-Racism THE INITIATIVE: Taking Action, that starts learners in on the journey for racial justice.

Learn More
How The World Bank Embedded Ethics & Compliance Across Their Global Organization

How The World Bank Embedded Ethics & Compliance Across Their Global Organization

From LRN’s 2021 Ethics & Compliance Program Effectiveness Report: How the World Bank applied ethics and compliance at their global company during COVID-19.

Learn More