Strengthening civil institutions: Why anti-corruption isn’t just about compliance

July 21, 2021
Susan Divers

Anti-corruption is in the spotlight.

 

In June, the first-ever UN General Assembly Special Session focused on corruption took place to shape the global anti-corruption agenda for the next decade. Not long after, U.S. President Biden deemed countering corruption as a core United States national security interest. This spotlighting of the importance of the fight against corruption was followed by a raft of actions in the U.S. and globally aimed at increasing law enforcement cooperation and preventing money laundering tied to illicit payments.

What this attention on anti-corruption means 

While headline-worthy and notable, there is little immediate impact on the programs core to companies’ efforts to fight corruption.

 

What is of consequence, however, are the connections being made in the broader business community, recognizing that the fight against anti-corruption is central to environment, social, and governance (ESG) strategies and commitments and to being a responsible global citizen generally. This shift in mindset and priority has been a long time coming and moves anti-corruption beyond compliance to the value creation side of business.

 

Consider: even when facilitation payments are legal and permitted, companies are beginning to realize that making facilitation payments to jump the queue for an X-ray in a state hospital skews the system, promotes and sustains bad governance and raises the “price” of an X-ray for the poor.

 

How anti-corruption policy encourages corporate governance 

Anti-corruption, of course, has always been a central tenet of compliance, but viewed more broadly and holistically, freedom from corruption underpins good governance, strengthens social institutions, and promotes fairness and accountability. For companies committed to ESG, anti-bribery isn’t just about compliance, it’s about sustainable models of doing business. A new framework from the UN Global Compact encapsulates that shift. It aligns with a recent panel, also from the UN, and highlights the need to raise the bar in business to adopt an ethical and values-based approach to culture, governance and leadership. This move to “transformational governance” can generate double benefits: less corruption and human rights violations and greater shared value for business, employees, investors, consumers, and communities.

 

The key takeaway 

The fact that anti-corruption is now viewed as integral to sustainability and integral to the ESG framework, Goal 16, and strategies to ensure responsible business generally is the big news on the anti-corruption landscape. Taking this values-based approach helps reinforce that doing the right thing, even if not required by law, is consistent with sustainability and good governance and everyone in the long run.

 

This article was originally published in The Compliance & Ethics Blog.

About the Author

Susan Divers

LRN Senior Advisor

More Content by Susan Divers

Most Recent Posts

Adaptive learning: What is it, and do you need it for E&C training?

Adaptive learning: What is it, and do you need it for E&C training?

LRN Learning Director Kristen Motzer explains what adaptive learning is and when it does—and doesn’t—make sense for ethics and compliance training.

Learn More
What is a “best practice” when we’ve never been here before?

What is a “best practice” when we’ve never been here before?

LRN shares the latest ethics and compliance best practices as it relates to policy simplification, developing training, and building ethical culture.

Learn More
5 best practices to nail your next E&C executive presentation

5 best practices to nail your next E&C executive presentation

LRN shares five best practices to presenting your ethics and compliance program and gaining stakeholder buy-in.

Learn More